You can subscribe or unsubscribe to the Newsletter here:
For each request you will recieve a confirmation email.
Please enter your email address:
You can subscribe or unsubscribe to the Newsletter here:
For each request you will recieve a confirmation email.
Please enter your email address:
Issue No 9. December 2006
Welcome to the ninth edition of the newsletter of the “Breaking the Barriers to eGovernment” project, funded by the European Commission’s eEurope 2005 Modinis programme. In addition to the findings from the project’s good-practice case studies and other activities, the newsletter contains news, information and resources. Our overall aim is to offer expert insights and practical advice on ways of overcoming obstacles to the growth of high-quality and innovative uses of eGovernment capabilities in Europe.
Helsinki Workshop
The Breaking Barriers project held its fourth workshop on the 22nd of November 2006 at the IST 2006 conference, Helsinki, Finland.
The workshop provided the opportunity to bring together researchers and practitioners who are exploring ways to overcome barriers to eGovernment. Ten presenters spoke at the workshop providing viewpoints both from academia and practice on addressing obstacles to eGovernment progress and how the potential of eGovernment could be realised.
In total, 41 people attended the event from academia, industry and government from Australia, Belgium, Czech Republic, Finland, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Ireland, Israel, Italy, Malaysia, Netherlands, Norway, Portugal, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden and the UK. A workshop report and PowerPoint slides of the presentations can be accessed here: http://www.egovbarriers.org/?view=Events&type=pastevents&EventID=4
Next Workshop
The date of our next workshop is the 9th of March 2007 at the Open University of Catalonia, Barcelona. If interested in attending, please contact: mailto:rebecca.eynon@oii.ox.ac.uk
New! Setting priorities for eGovernment in the Netherlands
On November 17th the Dutch government organised the “E-vent E-overheidnext”, an eGovernment event that brought together government organisations, civil servants, experts, politicians, citizens and representatives of businesses in order to compose a list of 5 priorities for the agenda for electronic government for the new Dutch cabinet. During this conference the OECD gave a preliminary insight into their report on eGovernment in the Netherlands. This report is to be published before the end of this year (other country reports can already be found on the OECD website: http://www.oecd.org).
The presentations, workshops and discussion during the day have led to the following points:
New! Free access to Gov3 eGovernment “Risk Barometer”
Are you a senior manager charged with delivering an ICT-enabled change programme in the public sector? International evidence shows that most such programmes fail to achieve their objectives, because they fail to manage key strategic risks effectively. The Gov3 Risk Barometer is freely available online. By answering the nine questions you get a free, online assessment of the intrinsic risk level of your programme, scored on an ascending scale of risk from 0 to 100. Have a look at: http://public.gov3.net/public_pages/limited/consulting/gov3_barometer.htm
New! Publication of “Designing eGovernment”, Second Edition
Governments across the world have recognised the potential of new information and communication technologies (ICTs) to bring about fundamental renewal in not only government and public sector processes, but also their relationship with civil societal groups, the private sector, citizens, and various other actors. ICT provides enormous opportunities to increase efficiency and effectiveness in all kinds of policy sectors, and promises a real dialogue between policy makers and the public.
The second edition of Designing eGovernment, first published in 2001, includes updated texts of several chapters from the earlier edition as well as various chapters, among them a number of country reports written for the eGovernment session of the 17th World Congress of Comparative Law. In addition to visions of the concept of electronic government, it provides examples of already active electronic governance by including various chapters on developments in the United States (both federal and state), the United Kingdom, Canada, Germany, Italy, Denmark, and the Netherlands. It draws lessons (cross-national, between policy sectors and across administrations) from the design of electronic government and from evaluations of electronic government practice.
Aspects of eGovernment covered in the second edition include the following:
Background
Juliet Lodge has worked extensively with European partners on barriers to eGovernment. Currently, she works in two Framework Six projects that have eGovernment applications, “Challenge” and “r4eGOV
Challenge
Challenge is an inter-disciplinary project comprising over 25 universities. It focuses on the challenge of reconciling liberty and security. Juliet’s work focuses on issues of transparency and accountability, democratic legitimacy and border management. This involves analysis of biometrics tools for border management.
The data storage issues relate directly to cooperation among law and justice enforcement agencies, among others, in combating fraud and international crime, as well as in managing the automatic transmission of information for civil and criminal purposes across borders. A key concern arises from the Hague Programme principle of availability regarding law enforcement cooperation; this means that for legitimate purposes only information available in one system in one member state should be made available to counterpart administrators in other systems. Huge issues arise regarding mutual trust in the polities, personnel, ICT legacy systems, interoperability, data privacy, robustness of the ICT systems, data storage, out-sourcing etc.
r4eGov
Similar issues feature in r4eGov: administration in the large. This project focuses on the roll-out of eGovernment in practice. The partners include ICT providers like Unisys and SAP, universities, national civil services and EU agencies. The aim is to develop tools to making eGovernment work securely and in a way that citizens will trust. Juliet’s work in this area has three key dimensions:
Major challenges for the short-term
In the short term, major challenges include the issues of interoperability and trust. These issues are relevant at all levels of eGovernment, from local councils and services to national and international transactions and trans-border mobility. Getting the balance right between security and efficiency is difficult. The very first step is a better appreciation of the terminology. We have to unpick terms like ‘information’ to understand what it comprises and what might be done with it under systems designed to foster automatic information sharing for specified, limited and legitimate purposes.
The output is informed by citizen needs. It is clear that citizens worry about databases and ‘Big Brother’. Interoperable databases are needed for operational success, for example, in combating people trafficking, fraud, speeding up trans-border legal processes for civil and criminal matters, and accelerating citizen-centric services.
A one-stop shop for inputting data needed for several different matters, for example when a student enrols online at University (as they do at Leeds University), saves citizens time. However, there is anxiety over data security, function creep, lack of knowledge about what happens to the data held, who can access it when and how, along with concerns over control and accountability for out-sourced data. Citizens and many administrators feel most comfortable with systems that do not rely on large data banks – those that put the data subject in charge of the release of their data.
Many governments, however, are committed to big interoperable database systems, even though their record is not always encouraging. The big and common challenge for EU member states is to work together to make their approaches interoperable and compatible with robust data protection.
Long-term challenges
We need to build trust and security now for a future in which nano-technological applications and ambient technology will be the norm. This means that eGovernance applications we create now must be based on the most secure architectures possible. They must look forward and set high standards for quality data management, data privacy and political accountability as well as credible, ethical and robust security. Out-sourcing by public authorities must be addressed. There is no efficiency gain when security is sacrificed. Short term financial savings without baked-in security do administrations and citizens a disservice.
Trust in secure ICTs goes hand-in-hand with trust in public authorities. Erosion in any one sphere has negative repercussions for the others. There must be baked-in security from the outset. Bolt-on security is costly in time and money, efficiency and effectiveness. The astonishing weaknesses in ePassports illustrate this. It is inconceivable that the current generation of ePassports will be seen as secure enough to be issued in five, let alone ten years time.
Overcoming Barriers to eGovernment
In Challenge, part of our work involves producing reports, seminars and papers to inform opinion, including the European Parliament and national administrations. The Convention on the EU’s draft Constitution final report stressed that ‘citizens must be able to understand a system so that they can identify its problems, criticise it, and ultimately control it.’ In r4eGov we are working to identify and overcome the obstacles to interoperability and cooperation in policy areas of direct relevance to citizens and where the EU is committed to greater cooperation and integration.
Where identity checks for border management applications are concerned, it is easy for the impression to be created that all citizens are being potentially compromised and criminalised by the introduction of new technologies and data bases. It is also apparent that distrust is growing and that claims for ICTs are not believed. The focus on the communication of ‘security’ means that the hard work of actually making possible automatic information sharing for limited and specific purposes safe from function creep and attack is poorly understood.
We hope to redress that and to work with stakeholders and end-users to elaborate ethical requirements and solutions that do contribute to the overall policy goals of greater individual and collective security through carefully constructed solutions embedded in trusted and secure architectures.
See the full text of the interview here (word doc)
If you would like to get involved here are a few ways how:
New! Let us interview you!
The project is looking for Senior eGovernment leaders to interview for upcoming newsletters. If you would like to express your views regarding the barriers to eGovernment (or you know someone who would), please contact Elizabeth Muller at: elizabeth.muller@gov3.net
EC Project knowledge keeps improving
This project keeps improving and evolving. Find our continuously updated website please go to: http://www.egovbarriers.org. If you would like to contribute articles or web directory items, please contact: mailto:rebecca.eynon@oii.ox.ac.uk
Join the debate
Discuss your experiences of barriers to eGovernment; share ideas, good practice and case studies on our forum at: http://forum.egovbarriers.org/forum11.html
Recommend us
We would appreciate it if you would forward this email to colleagues you think would benefit from this service.
To unsubscribe, please click here http://www.egovbarriers.org/?view=maillist
For problems and support please contact us here http://www.egovbarriers.org/?view=contact
This newsletter is published under contract with the European Commission, eGovernment Unit, DG Information Society and Media. It may be copied, distributed and used for educational purposes. The views expressed may not in any circumstances be regarded as stating an official position of the European Commission. Neither the European Commission nor any person acting on its behalf is responsible for the use that might be made of the information provided.